SiSoftware Sandra Lite 2009.SP1 Beta (15.42)
Website: Sisoftware
-
Core i7 965 (4x3.2GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
-
Core i7 940 (4x2.93GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
-
Core i7 920 (4x2.66GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x2.8GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 710 (3x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 805 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 810 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 940 (4x3.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 920 (4x2.8GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom X4 9850 BE (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 710 (3x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 810 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x2.8GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 805 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom X3 8750 BE (3x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
AMD Athlon X2 7750 BE (2x2.7GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR3)
MB/s (higher is better)
Sisoft Sandra shows better performance for the DDR3 equipped systems, but also benefits from the faster memory controller clock, an improved CPU frequency and more cores to play with too (it's a multi-threaded memory bandwidth test). The Core i7 CPUs storm away, as expected - triple-channel DDR3 and HyperThreading do well in this synthetic test, but the triple and quad-core AMD CPUs also fare pretty well too.
It seems the smaller L3 cache also has a deficit too - because the Phenom II X4 at 2.6GHz and a 2.0GHz core clock on DDR2 mixes it in with the DDR3 results, yet the Phenom II X4 810 on DDR2 which is virtually identical, bar a 4MB L3 cache instead of 6MB, takes quite a big drop in performance.
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core i7 965 (4x3.2GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
-
Core i7 940 (4x2.93GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x2.8GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x2.8GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
Core i7 920 (4x2.66GHz, 6.4GHz QPI, SMT enabled)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 710 (3x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 810 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X3 710 (3x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 810 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 940 (4x3.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom X4 9950 BE (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9650 (4x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 805 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 805 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT, DDR3)
-
AMD Phenom II X4 920 (4x2.8GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9550 (4x2.83GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
Core 2 Quad Q9450 (4x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom X4 9850 BE (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR2)
-
AMD Phenom X3 8750 BE (3x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
AMD Athlon X2 7750 BE (2x2.7GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.66GHz, 1,066MHz FSB, DDR3)
Nanoseconds (lower is better)
The AM3 DDR3-1,333MHz C7 latency is basically equalling DDR2 latency at 1,066MHz C5 - AMD needs more frequency, more channels, or a better memory controller, because when we tested the Core i7 with
single and dual channel DDR3 1,066MHz, it was still cutting 10ns less than the AMD parts here.
Want to comment? Please log in.